I think in most cases, especially if it’s high quality content, I would just unleash the 100 pages. Now, if you’re talking about 10,000 or 100,000 or a million pages, you might be a just a little more cautious.
It’s not that that would cause any sort of automatic penalty, but if we see a site that was nothing the other day, and all of a sudden there’s about 4 million pages in our index, that might be a sort of thing where someone might come and take a look at that site and say ‘OK, is that legitimate content, or is it nothing but auto-generated junk. That sort of thing, where there’s no value added to the content.
So, 100 pages I wouldn’t really worry about, but I would make sure that it’s high quality content. A lot of times, when’re creating the content organically, you’ll end up with a page at the time.
I’d say, just go ahead and publish it when you have that new page.
You don’t necessarily have to wait until you have a lot of different content and batch it up and release it.
It’s totally fine to release it just one page at the time, especially for the small scale stuff and if it’s high quality content – I wouldn’t worry about it.
Related posts:
- Is there a way to benefit from content scraped from your site?
- Hi Matt, what are your opinions on optimizing an Ecommerce website where the main pages/products may not necessarily be rich in content?
- Are product description pages on an e-commerce site termed as duplicate content, if the same product description appears on other sites? It does happen for many branded products
- What impact does “page bloat” have on Google rankings? Most of the winners in SEO seem to have very simple pages (very few images, HTML-only design), sometimes to the detriment to the user in a poorly designed page.
- As far as big brands go, why is it that they seem to do well irregardless of relevance, content or links when analyzing keyword placement in search engine result pages?
